Last updated: March 2007
Statutes and RegulationsBack to Debt Collection Table of Contents
Back to Consumer Law Table of Contents
Back to Deskbook Main Table of Contents
Information about consumers is often sought by lenders, credit sellers, insurance companies, employers and others who use the information to minimize their risk. There are companies called "credit bureaus" or "credit reporting agencies" which gather and store information on all Americans who use credit. They then sell this information to those who need it. Credit bureaus do not grant credit to anyone, but they do collect enormous quantities of information on consumers and issue consumer credit reports.
A person’s credit reporting file affects their access to home mortgages, car loans, and other forms of consumer credit, residential leases, employment and insurance. A consumer’s ability to access credit depends on the credit bureau’s accuracy in documenting his/her credit history as well as the bureau’s prompt compliance in correcting mistakes once they are discovered. Unfortunately, the consumer cannot choose or replace the particular credit bureau that gathers and maintains the information about him/her.
The FCRA is designed to:
The FCRA covers consumer reports or investigative consumer reports made by consumer reporting agencies (e.g., credit bureaus, investigative reporting companies).
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681(a), a consumer report is any oral or written communication made by a consumer reporting agency that bears on a consumer’s:
and is used, expected to be used, or collected for the following purposes:
Consumer Purpose. A report is generally a consumer report if the information was expected to be used or was gathered for any consumer purpose.
The information contained in a consumer report includes:
It contains financial information such as:
It provides detailed information regarding the status, payment history, and credit limits of a consumer’s credit accounts; tax liens, bankruptcies or court judgments; and who requested credit in the last 2 years.
A report is not a "consumer report" (and the FCRA does not apply) if:
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681d, the creditor need not notify the consumer before obtaining a "consumer report" unless it is an "investigative consumer report" (where information was obtained through personal interviews with neighbors, friends, or associates).
Advance Notice of Investigative Report
Before obtaining an investigative consumer report, the user must:
Notification of Credit Denial
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681d, if a consumer requests credit for personal, family, or household purposes, and it is denied (or the charge for it is increased) because of information contained in a consumer report from a consumer reporting agency, the user of the report must notify the consumer, orally or in writing, of the name and address of the consumer reporting agency making the report.
NOTE: The notice must be given "even though the information itself may not be adverse."
Information Not From Agency
If the adverse action is based on similar information from someone other than a "consumer reporting agency," the user must notify the consumer of his or her right to request disclosure of information.
The consumer has 60 days to make such a request in writing.
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681b, a consumer report may lawfully be used only for:
NOTE: An attorney’s use of a consumer report on prospective witnesses, jurors, or clients is restricted.
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681c, information becomes obsolete after seven years (10 years for bankruptcy).
Exceptions. The time limitation is not applicable in:
A consumer reporting agency has no affirmative duty to update information (except for the limitation on reporting obsolete information) that was:
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681e, a consumer reporting agency must maintain reasonable procedures to assure maximum accuracy of the information reported.
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681g, a consumer can request the information in his or her file with a consumer reporting agency.
A consumer reporting agency has no affirmative duty to inform a consumer of this right.
Disclosure of Information
A consumer may not examine the actual file, but is entitled to disclosure of:
The form of the disclosure must not only be accurate but must be presented in such a way that the consumer can be able to clearly understand the data that is disclosed. The consumer must be told about each item in the file; a mere summary is not enough. Explanations of coded information must be provided.
Negligent or willful failure of the agency to comply with these disclosure requirements is actionable.
Fee for Information
The consumer reporting agency must provide the requested information free if the consumer requests it within 30 days after receiving notice of an adverse action (by creditor, insurer, or employer) based on a consumer report. Otherwise, a reasonable fee may be charged.
Disclosures can be in person or by telephone, with a prior written consent and proper identification. Disclosures can also be provided by mail with the consumer’s consent. A request for a written disclosure should be made since it provides a record of the CRA’s compliance or noncompliance with the FCRA.
If a consumer has received notice that a consumer report contributed to a denial, that notice will identify the agency providing the report. That is usually the best agency from which to first request a report. However, for a full picture of a consumer’s credit record, it is generally advised to request disclosure from all three major reporting agencies.
See NCLC manual on FCRA for phone numbers and addresses of the three major CRAs to obtain information about ordering reports.
Time for CRAs to respond: The law does not specify. It can take from several working days to 3 weeks.
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681i, the consumer reporting agency must investigate and correct the file if necessary.
When a consumer has identified inaccurate or incomplete information in the report, the consumer may ask the CRA to reinvestigate the information. This procedure has several components.
First, the consumer requests the CRA to reinvestigate the information in writing (although it is not required to be in writing by the statute). All letters should include the consumer’s name, address and Social Security number; a clear description of the items in the credit report that the consumer is disputing; an explanation why the item is disputed; a request for the deletion or correction of the item; and a copy of the credit report in question.
The CRA must reinvestigate within a reasonable time of receiving the consumer’s request. The industry standard appears to be within 30 days. If the consumer does not receive a response from the credit bureau within 30 days, a follow-up letter should be sent, along with a copy of the original letter. Failure of the agency to comply with the reinvestigation provisions within a reasonable period of time should subject the CRA to liability under the FCRA.
The reinvestigation must be a good faith effort; it must be a full investigation of the underlying facts. The CRA must check with both the original sources and other reliable sources of the disputed information. Its not enough to determine whether the information was accurate or complete at the time it was furnished to the agency. The agency must record the current status of the information.
The consumer should try to correct an item on the reports of all three national credit bureaus. The agency cannot charge the consumer for the reinvestigation.
Second, if the agency does not correct or delete the information, the consumer can file a statement with the agency disputing the item. This then will be included in future consumer reports on the consumer. Merely including the statement in a consumer report does not satisfy the statute. The report must also note that the information is disputed.
The CRA cannot charge the consumer to receive this statement or to include it in future reports
Third, the consumer can request the agency to contact past users of an inaccurate report to explain the inaccuracy or the consumer’s dispute with the information in the report. The notice indicates the items that were deleted and includes the consumer’s statement, or a summary of that statement. Consumers cannot be charged for such notices to past users.
The agency must clearly and conspicuously disclose to the consumer the right to request the agency to notify past users of a disputed report. This notice must be provided no later than the time that the information is deleted or the statement of dispute is filed.
The FCRA imposes no liability on a creditor or other third party for giving inaccurate information to the reporting agency. Moreover, the FCRA limits a consumer’s right to bring a proceeding in the nature of defamation, invasion of privacy or negligence with respect to the reporting of information.
There are two exceptions to this immunity: first, there is no immunity if the false information was provided with malice or willful intent to injure the consumer. Second, there is no immunity if the consumer obtained the information directly from the furnisher.
CRAs are not liable under FCRA merely for reporting inaccurate information. Liability is based instead on an agency, whenever it prepares a consumer report, failing to follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information about the consumer. Thus, the FCRA provides a cause of action for an agency failing to enact reasonable procedures, not for furnishing one particular inaccurate report.
It is also actionable under FCRA if the CRA violates any of the consumer’s rights to reinvestigation; to have deleted or corrected inaccurate or unverified information,; to file a statement of dispute and have it appear in future reports; and, to have the correction or statement of dispute provided to past users.
Willful Noncompliance
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681n, a credit reporting agency that willfully fails to comply may be liable for:
Negligent Noncompliance
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681o, a consumer reporting agency that negligently fails to comply may be liable for:
Statute of Limitations
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681p, the statute of limitations is two years.
If willful misrepresentation exists, a discovery rule applies.
The Act imposes criminal liability (with up to $5,000 fine and/or up to one year imprisonment) for:
Any violation of the FCRA is deemed an unfair or deceptive act or a deceptive act or practice in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, subject to the FTC’s administrative enforcement mechanisms.
Obviously, the consumer should utilize the above procedure to clear up inaccurate or incomplete or outdated credit reports. However, there are other things a consumer can do to clean up a blemished credit rating. Some of these other things include:
Even if some blemishes on a credit rating cannot be cleared up, a consumer should not assume a blemished credit rating will lead to a credit denial. If one creditor refuses to extend credit, a consumer should try another one. However, some selectivity should be used in sending out credit applications because credit denials will appear on future credit reports sent to other users.
A common creditor and collection agency threat is to ruin the consumer’s credit record if s/he does not pay up on the debt. Essentially, the creditor or collector threatens the consumer that they will report the debt to a credit bureau, thereby ruining their credit standing. These threats are designed to wrench compliance with payment terms.
Consumers should largely ignore these threats. They are unlikely to be meaningful. If a creditor is a subscriber to a credit reporting agency, information is reported in a standardized fashion each month, so a delinquent debt probably has already been reported. Even when payment is made, the existence of the delinquency will remain on the report as historical information. The threat is meaningless because it has already been carried out.
Threats from collection agencies also are meaningless. It is unlikely that a collection agency subscribes to a credit reporting agency or will want to go to the expense of collecting and sending them information. The consumer should also bear in mind that false threats from collection agencies are actionable under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (see section of manual on Collection Agencies).
Consumers in financial trouble should not pay the creditor that threatens the loudest, but instead should pay off those debts whose nonpayment will have the most adverse consequences for the family. It is essential that consumers not pay unsecured debts (like credit cards, hospitals, etc.) ahead of mortgages, rent, utilities, and secured debts.
If a consumer has a valid defense to a debt, the best course of action usually is to withhold payment of that debt. Consumer concerns over ramifications of such an action on their credit record are misplaced. Federal law protects consumers from adverse marks in their credit records while they are disputing debts. Disputing a debt will not result in the creditor ruining the consumer’s credit record. Usually, the opposite is true – disputing the debt is the best tactic to clearing up the credit record.
Dispute settlements should cover credit reporting issues. Settlements should have language that either requires the creditor to withdraw the entire report of the disputed debt, or permits reporting the debt but requires the creditor to take steps to avoid having unfavorable information about the debt included in any credit report. There is model language for such settlements.
A consumer’s file at a CRA should contain only information on the consumer. There must be a separate file for the spouse. Thus, a spouse or former spouse’s poor credit history will not reflect on the consumer.
Under the ECOA, creditors must furnish certain data to CRAs. If a consumer can use or is obligated on a spouse’s account, the creditor must designate the account to reflect the participation of both spouses. The CRA can use this information to update the files for both spouses. However, the general rule under the ECOA is that a creditor cannot make inquiry about an applicant’s spouse or former spouse to the applicant, a CRA, another creditor or any other source. Moreover, in general, credit cannot be based on information that the creditor sought on the spouse or former spouse.
Exceptions to the general rule:
If a consumer wants to know what information a consumer reporting agency has collected about him or her, he or she can:
For a list of organizations in your area that may be able to help you, enter your zip code.
User Survey -
Please take a moment to fill out our User Survey to help us to provide better service.