Defending Hospital Collection Cases - Counterclaim: Malpractice

Defending Hospital Collection Cases - Counterclaim: Malpractice

Last updated: October 2005

(Chapter 8 from Defending Hospital Collection Cases Manual)



The Consumer Fraud Act prohibits unfair practices in trade or commerce.  Starting in 2004, lawsuits have been filed across the country which allege that charging uninsured patients three times what insured patients have to pay--for the same services--constitutes an unfair trade practice within the meaning of the law. To date there have been few decisions on this issue, but a local judge has allowed a Consumer Fraud Act claim of this nature to survive a motion to dismiss (a suit of this nature in California against giant Tenet Healthcare Corp. settled in 2004).  See Servedio, below.

Related Documents

Memorandum of Law
Document Requests
Opinion, Servedio v. Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center


The dictum "the best defense is a good offense" is true in the context of hospital collection cases as well.  If your client has a possible claim of malpractice, he/she may be able to recover big bucks with which to pay the hospital bill.   Always inquire into the quality of services rendered and the outcome of the treatment.  Note the two-year (in some instances four-year) limitation period in the Code of Civil Procedure, 735 ILCS 5/13-212.

Back to top
Back to Table of Contents


Helpful Organizations
The following organizations may be able to help you with

For a list of organizations in your area that may be able to help you, enter your zip code.



We welcome your comments and suggestions

User Survey - Please take a moment to fill out our User Survey to help us to provide better service.

Please do not email legal questions or information about your problem. We will not answer legal questions or provide legal assistance. You can find referrals to legal organizations that may be able to help you by clicking here.